Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/Waldmannjwteparla2.trs

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → f(x, f(x, a))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → f(x, f(x, a))

Q is empty.

The TRS is overlay and locally confluent. By [15] we can switch to innermost.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → f(x, f(x, a))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x0)

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → F(x, f(x, a))
F(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → F(x, a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → f(x, f(x, a))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x0)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ Overlay + Local Confluence

    ↳ QTRS

      ↳ DependencyPairsProof

        ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

F(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → F(x, f(x, a))
F(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → F(x, a)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x) → f(x, f(x, a))

The set Q consists of the following terms:

f(f(f(a, f(a, a)), a), x0)

We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.